| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Social distancing? Try a better way to work remotely on your online files. Dokkio, a new product from PBworks, can help your team find, organize, and collaborate on your Drive, Gmail, Dropbox, Box, and Slack files. Sign up for free.

View
 

Networked Decision Making

Page history last edited by swanson@... 8 years, 4 months ago

Networked Decision Making, Weinberger, Too Big To Know, 2012

 

1. Networked decision making scales up better than top down: Covering extremely large projects is much easier. 

 

2. Excels when decisions require a great deal of local knowledge, but not when there are workflow dependencies and strict process

 

3. Networks can encourage energy and participation: They do not dampen differences, but there is still a need for common purpose. 

 

4.When decisions are distributed, more local knowledge can be applied. Less risk to whole. 

 

5. Local decisions are likely to express interests of participants (who volunteer): this can solve cooperation problems

 

6. Hierarchical organizations are not as resilient as distributed organizations

 

7. Hierarchical organizations require reduction of knowledge as it filters up: misses details and only deals in summaries 

 

 

 

Decisions in hierarchies are looking more like networks, less like pyramids. This is why leadership is less of a function about the skills of the leader then it is about the group that is being lead. 

 

Weinberger's view of network decisions line up very well with "loosely coupled systems." 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.